- Do we have to protect the interest of highly influential quarry owners who have cornered control of majority of the legally available marble mining leases in India, especially in Rajasthan State?
- Should we take measures to ensure that marble processing units that have comitted huge investments are able to deliver acceptable quality processed slabs and tiles at economical prices?
- Should we not take measures to protect our environment by restricting indegenous quarrying?
Whenever most governments frame policies, the person whose interests should be taken into account first is the end user and the ultimate consumer. However, ite seems that the consumers' interest is least important. The end user in India, i.e. the person using marble slabs for his home, office or construction projects should get acceptable quality of slabs / tiles at reasonable prices. What is happening today is that quarry owners in India charge exhorbitant prices for blocks that otherwise fail to meet acceptable standards by a processing unit even in a banana republic. Factories have little choice other than to process sub standard blocks to be able to supply slabs and tiles to consumers at accpetable prices. Indiscriminate quarrying is detrimental to the environment. Now who should governments look after? In my opinion it is the ultimate consumer. Let us hope the new policy changes will have a positive impact for the consumer.
The persons who are adversely affected by this change are the few quarry owners who have cornered large chunks of mining leases as well as those who just have namesake factories (read gang saws) on paper and have been hitherto cornering licences from the initial policy of 140,000 tons per annum. These are the people who are really affected. The former should now think of investing moneys in systematic quarrying techniques and supplying acceptable quality of blocks competitively without degrading the environment. We can do without the services of the latter. They have been cornering licences unjustifiably and selling them at premiums of over Rs.10,000/- per ton. What does this amount translate into? Rs.60 per square feet for a 2cm thick marble slab. If you take a floor price of Rs.14,000 C&F and add the premium, the raw material cost is already Rs.145 per square feet for what should have been Rs.85 (at the port before payment of duty and transportation and processing). This is really very uneconomical. What steps does a factory owner resort to?
- He will saw 18mm thickness and sell as 20mm. Consumer is already compromised at this stage. This is definitely happening.
- He may resort to over invoicing of imports. He may purchase substandard or maybe rejected blocks and have it over invoiced to comply with floor prices. This is detrimental to the economy. In case the processor is relieved of this burden of getting a licence alone for Rs.60 per sq. feet, hopefully he will avoid resorting to such measures.
The consumer is compromised by such measures. It is an accepted fact that the competition is between artificial materials (ceramics, concrete etc.) against the natural stones for use as floor and wall coverings indoors as well as outdoors. The demand for natural stones is very high in India due to the increased construction activities for new projects as well as renovations. The need of the hour is improving supply of raw materials without degrading our environment and the best way is to free imports totally to ensure that our domestic consumers receive acceptable quality of slabs and tiles and our construction projects are of acceptable quality once the materials of uncompromised specifications is supplied.

